RidersHockey wrote:I would like to apologize on behalf of all of the RR fans for these arrogant and cocky posts that some of these kids have been posting on this website. But some of you people have to give credit where credit is due, I know some of you don't like to admit it but RR was the better team that weekend, and yes Meland was the reason why they won, but saying that Bismark would have beat them on a "neutral" site is just flat out stupid. There are times in all sports where the better team doesn't always win for ex. last years RR team should have walked over everyone and they lost it, the NE Patriots lost to NYG and they Pats where a far better team, the Sioux in years past have been the favorites going into the frozen four...but that is why you have playoffs cause its a new season and on any given day any time can win.
Only good post I've seen from a RR Student/Alum/Part in a good few days, thank you.
nothinghappend wrote:hockeyhigh is jsut jealous that south didnt win state and rr did. its not a big deal.
I'm hardly jealous, I'm realistic. It's pretty funny that you only come out and flaunt your almighty opinions upon us after the state tournament ended. Also, to rustle your feathers a bit, Central, Bismarck and Fargo South were all more skilled teams than Red River was, and that's a fact.
Ditka14 wrote:Timmay07 wrote:How about the biggest suprise of the State Tournament. Tony Bina Coach of the year.
I personally thought peluso had it in the bag...don't they vote morning of the championship? That's what i thought and to bring a west team into the championship game first time in 16 years.
I think he deserved it, but really it's more about who's voting than who's getting voted for.
Also, Bina coached a team that hadn't gone to state in two years, and went from just above .500 to well above it. They had a pretty good season regardless.
Go Sioux wrote:Saucesauer wrote:BLJELW wrote:Why don't all theteams play paper, rock, scissors to see who is the best team....Odviously Red river is throwing rock because they have a nice one on their fingers saying state champs....nuff said
Would BHS and South win if they throw paper than because they beat them on paper in every catagory but one, and the way I have been taught is 5>1
Last time i checked red river beat south in the semi finals and bismarck in the finals. So i think saucesauer is a little sour about RR winning. Jealous?
You need to realize when someone is simply trying to get under your skin Go Sioux. Also, those teams were better on paper, but that doesn't mean they'll win.
Saucesauer wrote:I was completely fine with them winning until I got back home from GF and had to see all of these people running their mouths about how every player on the team is gods gift to hockey...
I concur with this. Yes, Red River won and I'm perfectly fine with that. It's when players, parents, and people that don't even play the sport or watch it other than at State that bothers me when they come on here and say how good they are after the fact. Ignorance may be bliss, but arrogance is pathetic.
stillgotyourback wrote:Saucesauer wrote:at least come back at me with a intelectual argument insted of middle school girl name calling
Hows this for an intellectual argument...RR won (and your a sissy)
(You're a sissy)* Maybe by the end of senior year at RR you'll figure out the difference between your and you're.