gfhockey wrote:RR beat FS tonite 6-4. RR had a lead of 4-1 but blew it but pulled it out.
Sioux4ever wrote:GFRR and GFC play East Grand Forks, Warroad, Roseau. Fargo South plays Moorhead, etc. I do not think they are going to eliminate those games to add a game against CHS, BHS, Dicky, Williston, Minot, etc. It may be unfair to the WDA teams but if a team is going to travel 3+ hours, I would bet GFRR would travel the 3 hours to play Warroad or Roseau instead of out to Bismarck or Minot.
sportsman101 wrote:fargo south outplayed GFRR first period. red river scored their first goal on a 5-3 powerplay rebound 5 feet in the air that was batted out of the air into the net. 2nd period all the red river goals were directly off of poor mistakes by south two from trying to stick handle in the slot. and 2 from bad changes which resulted with odd man rushes and a break away. GFRR is very beatable
HockeyHigh wrote:Eh, posted the box score. Shanley got a goal on a 3 shot period, can't set much up with 3 shots, so I'm guessing it was pretty weak. Shanley goalie faced just shy of 50 shots, meaning South had it in their zone most of the game. Sounds like a whipping to me. Wasn't at this game because I didn't expect anything less than what happened, guess I shoulda gone.
highheat wrote:Sioux4ever wrote:Agree with your assessment, 6-1 game, 48-18 in shots, does not seem like it was a close game. Apparently there was some controversy on 1 of South's goals (quoted by another poster on the Shanley topic.) The lights went out, and the ice melted, and South had a guy in the crease, and the net was off, and the referee was at the other end of the ice, etc......
...and jesus was at the concessions while moses was in the bathroom. only the lord knows where noah was. if those three wouldve been present in the stands they would have easily taken this game by double digits. too bad its going to take more than that for shanley to pull anything off the rest of this season. ill give them this though, theyve taken some great steps in the right direction compared to years past.
as for south, talk about a rollercoaster of a season. theyve done some great things this year that were similar to what they had been doing last year, but then theyve had some huge slip ups.
highheat wrote:Sioux4ever wrote:Agree with your assessment, 6-1 game, 48-18 in shots, does not seem like it was a close game. Apparently there was some controversy on 1 of South's goals (quoted by another poster on the Shanley topic.) The lights went out, and the ice melted, and South had a guy in the crease, and the net was off, and the referee was at the other end of the ice, etc......
...and jesus was at the concessions while moses was in the bathroom. only the lord knows where noah was. if those three wouldve been present in the stands they would have easily taken this game by double digits. too bad its going to take more than that for shanley to pull anything off the rest of this season. ill give them this though, theyve taken some great steps in the right direction compared to years past.
as for south, talk about a rollercoaster of a season. theyve done some great things this year that were similar to what they had been doing last year, but then theyve had some huge slip ups.
gopherguy17 wrote:South just beat west fargo . it was kinda close tell the third period. then south just barried them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests