scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
Run4Fun2009 wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
Isn't Class A the same way...and I think it is to speed up the girls game a little bit more.
scoobyx2 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
Isn't Class A the same way...and I think it is to speed up the girls game a little bit more.
The shot clock was first implemented in women's college ball (I believe) in the 70's. The biggest impact on the game was that it made "guard-play" a bigger factor. It even changed recruiting where going after shooting guards was almost as important as getting the big post players. Prior to the shot clock, teams could just move the ball around and wait for a mismatch for the center. When the defense would pack it in, the game was pretty boring and low scoring unless the center was really dominant.
winner-within wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:Run4Fun2009 wrote:scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
Isn't Class A the same way...and I think it is to speed up the girls game a little bit more.
The shot clock was first implemented in women's college ball (I believe) in the 70's. The biggest impact on the game was that it made "guard-play" a bigger factor. It even changed recruiting where going after shooting guards was almost as important as getting the big post players. Prior to the shot clock, teams could just move the ball around and wait for a mismatch for the center. When the defense would pack it in, the game was pretty boring and low scoring unless the center was really dominant.
1954 for the NBA...fans quit showing up for the games
scoobyx2 wrote:I think its great, and long overdue. Does anyone know why the boys time is set at 35 and the girls are set at 30 seconds? I understand that it is similar to college ball, but what is the reasoning?
Topgun wrote:This is a terable move it is the First move in makeing class me no Stratigy like Class A This should be repealed it makes defense game to easy and the Offensive game to fast
Indy5 wrote:Topgun wrote:This is a terable move it is the First move in makeing class me no Stratigy like Class A This should be repealed it makes defense game to easy and the Offensive game to fast
35 seconds is a long time. Most of the time, you've run your offense and got a shot in 35 seconds. It will rarely come into play. The only thing it'll do is prevent total stall ball and it will be noticed at the end of the game.
You might notice a few times at the end of quarters when a team will hurry and put up a quick shot to go 2 for 1 at the end of the quarter. So you are wrong, it actually adds more strategy to the game because you have things like that and you also have more defensive possibilities knowing that you only have 35 seconds to play D. Much more pressure can be applied.
Topgun wrote:Indy5 wrote:Topgun wrote:This is a terable move it is the First move in makeing class me no Stratigy like Class A This should be repealed it makes defense game to easy and the Offensive game to fast
35 seconds is a long time. Most of the time, you've run your offense and got a shot in 35 seconds. It will rarely come into play. The only thing it'll do is prevent total stall ball and it will be noticed at the end of the game.
You might notice a few times at the end of quarters when a team will hurry and put up a quick shot to go 2 for 1 at the end of the quarter. So you are wrong, it actually adds more strategy to the game because you have things like that and you also have more defensive possibilities knowing that you only have 35 seconds to play D. Much more pressure can be applied.
If you can stall the ball then they are not a good defense and will not win any way and stalling is entertaining to watch by it's self
Indy5 wrote:Topgun wrote:Indy5 wrote:Topgun wrote:This is a terable move it is the First move in makeing class me no Stratigy like Class A This should be repealed it makes defense game to easy and the Offensive game to fast
35 seconds is a long time. Most of the time, you've run your offense and got a shot in 35 seconds. It will rarely come into play. The only thing it'll do is prevent total stall ball and it will be noticed at the end of the game.
You might notice a few times at the end of quarters when a team will hurry and put up a quick shot to go 2 for 1 at the end of the quarter. So you are wrong, it actually adds more strategy to the game because you have things like that and you also have more defensive possibilities knowing that you only have 35 seconds to play D. Much more pressure can be applied.
If you can stall the ball then they are not a good defense and will not win any way and stalling is entertaining to watch by it's self
You have a very different perception than most people. You are the first person I have heard say they think watching stall ball is entertaining.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests