by fbinnd » Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:28 pm
High school sport is supposed to be the place where things still stay pure. We all know they aren't, but it's supposed to be the closest thing that approaches purity. That means schools get their run, they make due with what they have, and coaching really is evaluated, because you can't handpick your team.
That's why any high school transfer for the reason of sport only is a sickening factor. It's just not supposed to go on. This conversation all started when everyone was almost happy for Knife transferring to Bottineau. The Knife thread was all celebratory for her, without a real regard for the consequences.
Now, people have come forward and suggested the transfer was for more than just wins and losses, and, after hearing some reasons, and being detached from the situation, I'll give the benefit of the doubt and go with the flow. But the idea is still a valid idea, no matter the reason for the transfer. This is the reason I would have liked to see the Engelhardt situation looked into. This "I want to win a title" stuff is supposed to be reserved for the pros, not for high school sport.
Don't really care if I sound like an idiot. The evidence says I'm not. If this wasn't an issue, the NDHSAA would not have been compelled to change their transfer rule. But the new rule will do little to help. This is about parents, and we all know that parents are simply out of control in HS sports. When I guy like Waylon Starr goes 47-8, makes two trips to state, and still doesn't have the support of the parents, ND basketball has a problem. I fully believe that parents will uproot their entire family's lives, commute to work or take new jobs, just to "pick" a place for their kids to play. The closer we get to that atmosphere, the closer we get to the same teams always being loaded.
Bottineau makes for a perfect example. No matter the issue, a school with a huge enrollment advantage over the schools they will play will now get richer. Everyone has talked about why Knife is leaving Belcourt. Could someone answer why she's going to Bottineau? Your answer will not matter, because the question exposes this "rich get richer" atmosphere. If she's going to Bottineau for coaching, it means that kids will transfer to an upper eschelon of coaches. If it's their success, it means kids will transfer to successful programs. In either case, the idea of maintaining a program becomes tainted, and the natural turnover of HS ball gets delayed.