Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:17 pmSo who deserves that number 2 spot in the title game now?
Here's my argument:
I am not trying to bash Michigan in anyway, they are one of the top teams in the country no doubt. But when all is said and done, the number 2 spot in the BCS Title Game has to go to Florida. I mean come on now, toughest schedule in the country, they went 9-1 in the SEC, they won their conference title, they are a champion. Michigan is a 2nd place team. Florida won 10 games in the SEC, how do you leave them out??? They beat Tenn, Lsu, Ark, plus an improved Ken team, SC, Bama, and their rival Florida St., Michigan beat Wisconsin, Notre Dame and PSU, and to me Notre Dame is clearly overrated. Also, Florida played 9 bowl teams, Michigan played 7. So who do you give it to a conference champion who went 9-1 in the SEC? Or a 2nd place Michigan team? Do the math.
Here's my argument:
I am not trying to bash Michigan in anyway, they are one of the top teams in the country no doubt. But when all is said and done, the number 2 spot in the BCS Title Game has to go to Florida. I mean come on now, toughest schedule in the country, they went 9-1 in the SEC, they won their conference title, they are a champion. Michigan is a 2nd place team. Florida won 10 games in the SEC, how do you leave them out??? They beat Tenn, Lsu, Ark, plus an improved Ken team, SC, Bama, and their rival Florida St., Michigan beat Wisconsin, Notre Dame and PSU, and to me Notre Dame is clearly overrated. Also, Florida played 9 bowl teams, Michigan played 7. So who do you give it to a conference champion who went 9-1 in the SEC? Or a 2nd place Michigan team? Do the math.