Page 2 of 2

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:48 am
by packers21
I don't think there is any way Newtown should be playing 9man if their numbers say they should be playing AA. Play where the numbers place them, end of story.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:53 pm
by ndlionsfan
That's my question. What are their numbers? If they have 50 out that's one thing. If they have 20 that's another

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:42 am
by The Schwab
ndlionsfan wrote:That's my question. What are their numbers? If they have 50 out that's one thing. If they have 20 that's another


If a school has 150 boys and 20 go out that is there problem, build a program that kids want to be a part of, hire coaches who will bring pride back to the program and kids will go out.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:53 am
by Flip
ndlionsfan wrote:That's my question. What are their numbers? If they have 50 out that's one thing. If they have 20 that's another

I think it said they had 115 boys.

My guess is most of the teams in next years region 3 are glad New Town is with them.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:55 am
by The Schwab
Oh I'm not even talking about them being dominant in 9 man, because it will be the exact opposite, I disagree purely based on the numbers.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:35 pm
by packers21
Exactly you start making exceptions...when do you draw the line

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:20 pm
by Hinsa
I look at the New Town thing from this perspective: sure, New Town won't set the world on fire in 9-man. But they end up bumping someone up to 11-man that maybe shouldn't be there.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:26 pm
by Flip
why do they use the FR meals for football and not other sports? I know in MN you can have your enrollment reduced with FR meals, but they do it for every sport, not just football.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:32 pm
by Hinsa
It's a strange deal, but the NDHSAA folks, in looking back over participation data for the last however many years, have seen a correlation between schools with a significant number of students on reduced meal plans and football participation. They don't see the same correlation in other sports.

You could try to explain the correlation but that gets into a whole bunch of generalizations that almost smack of stereotyping. I'll let the NDHSAA professors explain that one.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:50 pm
by d_fense
Hinsa wrote:I look at the New Town thing from this perspective: sure, New Town won't set the world on fire in 9-man. But they end up bumping someone up to 11-man that maybe shouldn't be there.


There are enough teams that are opting up out of nine man, I don't think moving the largest nine man team up is a big deal.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:02 pm
by Indy5
Flip wrote:why do they use the FR meals for football and not other sports? I know in MN you can have your enrollment reduced with FR meals, but they do it for every sport, not just football.

Well, I'm pretty sure that wouldn't apply to any class A teams, so it wouldn't matter for other sports since there is only 2 classes.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:37 pm
by Flip
you're right for some reason I was thinking Turtle Mountain would be Class B

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:06 am
by ndlionsfan
Flip wrote:
ndlionsfan wrote:That's my question. What are their numbers? If they have 50 out that's one thing. If they have 20 that's another

I think it said they had 115 boys.

My guess is most of the teams in next years region 3 are glad New Town is with them.


I meant how many do they have out for fball? If they have 50 kids playing than they shouldn't be in 9man playing against teams with 15 kids out. But I'm guessing its more around 20.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:30 pm
by Flip
if I counted right they have 26 on the NDHSAA site

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:23 pm
by ndlionsfan
And I'm sure that number has dropped since the start of the season. Pretty hard to compete in 11man with those numbers, yet alone AA. Granted I'm all for building a program to increase numbers, but as someone stated before there are a lot of other factors in there that make that a hard thing to do. Can it be done? Of course. and I'm sure if Newtown or FW starts dominating 9man the NDHSAA will take another look at the enrollment factor. But remember, its not just Native American schools that this affects. There are a lot of other schools that have dropped their programs to co-op with someone else and their enrollment is weighted in that co-op as well.

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:32 pm
by MNTwinsFan
Sleepy wrote:They count boys in grades 7-10 for 2012. So those boys would be grades 8-11 in 2013, and grades 9-12 in 2014. I am assuming it is enrollment for the 2012 school year. Does it say somewhere that it is 2011 enrollment?



2012 numbers are finalized in October. This was done before then???

Re: 2013-2014 Plan

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:38 pm
by bulldog power
another team that should be 11-man based on enrollment but is 9-man now is richardton/taylor /hebron. what are your guys thoughts on them. they always were dominent when they were 9-man and now they even have a larger enrollment for it.