secretpotion wrote:sportsfan1989 wrote:HockeyHigh wrote:No, he's saying that he wasn't good enough at his position to get a spot, and if he wanted to play he had to play in an open forward spot.
Haters, haters...lol..Well actually I'd like to know your opinion on whos better than Rehak? Besides Wurden? With some facts please.
well rehak had 26 points in 24 games, spennigby had 28 in 20 games and im not sure but i think he made the select team that rehak didnt make it as a D
hockeyhigh are you saying that there wasn't enough offensive players to fill the roster cuz if that's what you're saying then this is gonna be the biggest bull flag i have ever raised.... i can guarantee that you not many other defense can jump in as offense and play....but if that's what you think then stick with that... and i took the time break down some stats...whether they matter or not, its up to you
Colby Rehak: 26pts....14.1% team total Pen..18...36pim....13.3% team total, All West Region, All Tournament Team, All State
Nic Spenningsby: 28pts....11.9% team total Pen..29... 61pim....15.8% team total, All West Region (why did spenningsby only play 4 less games)
colby also got at least two points during state(Red River game)....while spenningsby recieved.....um....0 points during state....:D(give credit to Dickinson 6 seed and Bottineau 7 seed) .... But spenningsby did have 25 more penalty minutes......so overall spenningsby lead slighty in points, he did leave his team killing off his penalties an extra 25 minutes...a period and a half!!! Although they are very close i am still going to go with colby........i'd watch out for that 8 ball